Ukraine’s Green Reconstruction: Environmental Challenges and EU Integration Opportunities

  • József Ráti Assistant Lecturer, Ludovika University of Public Service
Keywords: green reconstruction, sustainability, EU integration, circular economy, energy security, F15, O52, Q01, Q54

Abstract

Ukraine’s reconstruction must follow a sustainable path, not only to restore destroyed infrastructure but also to secure long-term competitiveness, energy security, and progress toward EU accession. This study examines the challenges and opportunities of post-war “green reconstruction,” defined here as a strategy that integrates decarbonization, circular economy practices, biodiversity restoration, and energy efficiency. This definition is adopted to ensure consistency with the European Green Deal pillars and with international climate and biodiversity commitments. The analysis highlights how environmental damage caused by the war interacts with pre-existing structural weaknesses, such as dependence on heavy industry, outdated infrastructure, and limited policy implementation. Drawing on official reports, EU and UN documents, and recent peer-reviewed research, the paper explores issues of pollutant emissions, waste and natural resource management, and the implications of the European Green Deal. Findings indicate that over 230 million tons of greenhouse gases were released in the first three years of the war, while at least US$35 billion in renewable energy investment will be required to meet climate targets. The study argues that reconstruction cannot be separated from European integration: achieving sustainability will demand comprehensive institutional reforms, stronger public participation, and close international cooperation, including concrete measures such as rapid ETS alignment, CBAM adaptation for industry, and mandatory circularity in reconstruction contracts.

Published
2025-09-26
How to Cite
Ráti, J. (2025). Ukraine’s Green Reconstruction: Environmental Challenges and EU Integration Opportunities. Köz-Gazdaság - Review of Economic Theory and Policy, 20(3), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.14267/RETP2025.03.06